“Although we didn’t know the scientific basis of those decisions, people had to comply and we think it worked,” says West African participant.

See the source image

Undercover footage from the World Health Summit 2022 in Berlin, Germany shows a participant admitting that global lockdowns recommended by the elite were rooted in politics, not science.

The World Health Summit, in partnership with the World Health Organization, held a three-day conference in October featuring 300 speakers and 3000 participants to discuss the global response to COVID-19 and future pandemic responses.

A member the German-West Africa Center for Pandemic Prevention (G-WAC), funded by Germany’s Federal Foreign Office, explained to an undercover Rebel News reporter that most of the policy decisions recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) during the COVID pandemic were not scientifically sound.

“In the heat of the pandemic, most of the decisions were not based on science like I said. They were just reactionary. Anything that would help,” the G-WAC member said.

“Now, with the benefit of hindsight, we can tell that some of those decisions is not backed by science.”

“The vaccines do not stop the spread of the disease. But now we know,” he added.

The G-WAC member went on to claim that ordering people to comply with arbitrary lockdown orders was a good decision, but probably wouldn’t happen again in light of new evidence that the lockdowns did virtually nothing to slow the spread of COVID-19.

“At first, nobody knew so it was political, yes, but we think it helped in flattening the curve as well,” he said. “So a decision had to be made. Although we didn’t know the scientific basis of those decisions, people had to comply and we think it worked.”

“A lot of things that happened during COVID wouldn’t have happened, from what we know now. People are much more prepared than they were before,” he added.

He also admitted that “some scientific processes may have been sidestepped or overlooked” by the pharmaceutical companies “so we could have vaccines.”

Despite the many speakers and topics, the negative consequences or ethical implications of imposing global lockdowns were not discussed at the summit.

These remarks, though maddening, are not surprising given the WHO and World Economic Forum’s stated goals for the world coming out of the COVID pandemic are not based on science, but control: vaccine passports, and central bank digital currencies as part of a social credit score system.